| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
LooneyToon
Veteran Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 61
|
| 90210 v. Melrose Place Mon Dec 01, 2008 6:19 pm |
 |
|
| Why would they remake 90210 unstead of Melrose place, Melrose was definitely the better show. . . Maybe all the Melrose Alums had better things going on in their careers. Thoughts? |
|
| |
|
 |
CrazyAboutTV
Site Admin
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
|
| Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:26 pm |
|
|
The networks seem to feel that their most profitable shows are the ones that appeal to young teens (13-14). I won't presume to know their business better than they do regardless of how ridiculous it seems to me.
13 and 14-year-olds are generally dreaming of their upcoming High School lives, not the slightly scary "on your own" twenties.
Anyway, that's my guess as to why. |
|
| |
|
|
SOFarSoGood
Full Member
Joined: 10 Apr 2008
Posts: 49
|
| Wed Dec 03, 2008 6:10 pm |
|
|
| Yeah plus, heather locklear isn't exactly the busiest actress in hollywood either. The returning members of 90210 were still active on the screen before there return to their roots. they still had some mass appeal. Heathers audience is much older now. |
|
| |
|
|
Imposter34
Full Member
Joined: 20 May 2008
Posts: 25
|
| Thu Dec 04, 2008 5:15 pm |
|
|
| Actually I think Heather is still pretty busy these days, I know she has a role in the Hannah Montanna movie that’s getting made haha, and we all know Hannah is no small potatoes. She also has a new TV movie coming out! I’m 99% I saw her in a commercial for it last weekend. I’ll look it up. |
|
| |
|
|
CrazyAboutTV
Site Admin
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
|
| Fri Dec 05, 2008 1:41 pm |
|
|
| SOFarSoGood wrote: | | Heathers audience is much older now. |
That's not a big problem. The general population is much older now. We go to movies much later in life now and we absolutely have more free time to watch TV than the young, struggling audience trying to get started in life.
Plus ... Heather makes one fine-looking mom and there's plenty of those parts. She'd probably do best in Lifetime movies where she's a mom by day and a lady of the evening at night or a woman who marries a much older man and then murders him for his money ... you get the picture. The possibilities are endless. |
|
| |
|
|
LooneyToon
Veteran Member
Joined: 03 Apr 2008
Posts: 61
|
| Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:51 pm |
|
|
| Did any one catch Heather's TV movie? I did it was pretty good, but that story has been told a trilliion times . |
|
| |
|
|
CrazyAboutTV
Site Admin
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 877
|
| Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:48 pm |
|
|
| I'm currently travelling and without Lifetime. Like you say, most of their movies' plots have been done sooooooo many times. When there's absolutely nothing on that I want to see more, they can be entertaining though. |
|
| |
|
|
johnmason
Veteran Member
Joined: 09 Aug 2005
Posts: 54
|
| 90210 and Melrose Place Fri Jul 31, 2009 12:42 pm |
|
|
Now the CW is saying that there will be a remake of Melrose Place coming in the fall (of 2009!).
If it's as much of an improvement over the new Beverly Hills 90210 as the old Melrose Place was over the old 90210, it should be terrific! I've watched both of the old ones on dvd from my local library for free!
 |
|
| |
|
|
MainMan
Novice Member
Joined: 13 Aug 2005
Posts: 18
Location: Silicon Valley
|
| 90219 v. Melrose Place Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:33 pm |
|
|
| In its day, Melrose Place was considered quite sexy. I've seen an episode or two of the original series and it was pretty hot in places for an early nineties tv show. I guess that wasn't really so long ago though. |
|
| |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
